Be defensible enough to satisfy lawyers
("Readable" doesn't make the list.)
"We may use Content you provide us to improve our Services, for example to train the models that power ChatGPT."
"Once you choose to delete Personal Data, we will remove it from our systems within 30 days..."1
https://openai.com/policies/us-privacy-policy/ ↩︎
The questions are yours. The gap between them is 25 pages of legal English.
github.com/agruen/mcp-demo — clone it now, everything from today is in there
From the Model Context Protocol — an open standard (modelcontextprotocol.io)
https://mcp-demo.workingpaper.co
A 25-page policy fits in one JSON file that loads once at startup. The model can't hallucinate what it reads from structured data — and every response carries an attribution line back to the source.
concern: training, deletion, ads, children, rights...
It's voluntary. Models comply most of the time — and the dashboard measures the rate.
Who is asking — the user-type × concern heatmap is a constituent-needs report
This is the feedback loop most policy authors never get.
\(Intent + Telemetry = Insight + Liability\)
(That's not a bug in the lesson. That is the lesson.)
docker compose up --build -d
Ask: "Does OpenAI sell my data?"
Then open /reporting/ — congratulations, you're a data point.
Verify like you mean it — call every tool through the real endpoint
Steps 1–2 are where the human judgment lives. Claude Code is genuinely good at 3–5 — once it has a working example to follow. You now have two.
ag@workingpaper.co
github.com/agruen/mcp-demo